Pharmacists also considered their own personal views. This study used hypothetical cases, which may have been handled differently if presented as real scenarios in the pharmacy. This study may have benefitted practice by raising

awareness of the complexity of decision-making, as well as highlighting the impact of personal p38 MAPK inhibitor review beliefs and GP relationships on practice. 1. Cooper RJ, Wingfield J, Bissell P. Ethical, religious and factual beliefs about the supply of emergency hormonal, contraception by UK community pharmacists. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 2008; 34: 47–50. 2. Hanna LA, Hughes CM. ‘First, Do No Harm’: Factors that Influence Pharmacists Making Decisions about Over-the-Counter Medication A Qualitative Study in Northern Ireland. Drug Safety 2010; 33: 245–255. Michael Wilcock, Joanna Lawrence Pharmacy, Royal selleck inhibitor Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK Inter-professional collaboration as a means of improving patient care requires that clinical pharmacists have good communication skills. Doctors’ and nurses’ views on how well pharmacists communicate were captured via a brief survey. The results have informed a short tailored training programme on communication

skills for pharmacists and technicians. To ensure that patients receive the optimum level of care it is essential that clinical pharmacists, as members of the healthcare team, can effectively communicate with prescribers and nurses. A recent report acknowledge that the future for pharmacy practice will see the wider

pharmacy team drawing on their individual clinical and communication skills to work with other healthcare professionals and patients to optimise the use of medicines.1 As part of a wider service improvement Venetoclax datasheet project, designed to assess and develop the communication skills of the pharmacist team, we undertook a baseline assessment of how clinical staff perceive the pharmacists’ communication skills. Two 3rd year medical students, attached to the pharmacy department for a two week Special Study Unit, undertook a brief survey of doctors and nurses on a range of hospital wards. The survey instrument consisted of 4 closed questions (3 requiring answers on a 5-point Likert scale and the fourth requiring a simple yes/no response), and a final question seeking free text comments. Staff were advised of the broad purpose of the survey (to ascertain how they perceive the ability of the clinical pharmacists to communicate with clinical staff) and reassured that the survey was anonymous. This was deemed service improvement performed to meet specific local needs and ethics approval was not sought. During April 2013, thirty-eight clinical staff (18 junior doctors, 20 nurses) were approached and agreed to answer the survey.