Individual differences in language hemispheric dominance may also have contributed in masking the hemispheric difference in the frontal regions. For instance, as reported above, one right-handed participant (J. T.) has a right-hemisphere dominance for language, which was confirmed by an fMRI procedure. Another advantage of Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the fNIRS is that both [HbO] and [HbR] concentrations can be

measured, whereas the fMRI is limited to measuring only [HbR] concentrations. Typically, in healthy participants, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) is increased by the neural activity resulting in an increase in [HbO] and [HbT] concentrations, with a decrease in [HbR] concentrations (Sakatani Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical et al. 1998). A number of fNIRS studies, however, documented other patterns in the relative concentration of HbO and HbR during verbal tasks. Watanabe et al. (1998) recorded an increase in [HbR] in the inferior frontal lobe when participants were tested in a written verbal fluency task and Yamamoto Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and Kato (2002) reported increases in [HbO], [HbR], and [HbT] in the Broca area in a word repetition task. Lo et al. (2009) observed a significant [HbO] increase in an overt text reading task with no variation in the [HbR] concentration. In our experiment, most of the participants showed a typical

increase in [HbO] and [HbT] when they began to read, with a return to the baseline level once they stopped reading, and this in all cerebral regions known to be involved in reading. Three Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of the participants showed a reverse pattern of activation, that is, a decrease in [HbO] with an increase in [HbR] in the bilateral prefrontal and frontotemporal regions (B. B.), and in the bilateral prefrontal gyri (F. M. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and C. T.). Similar patterns

of hypooxygenation were reported in Liu et al. (2008)’s study when participants read out loud a nonfamiliar text. Six of the 22 participants showed hypooxygenation in the left prefrontal region and three in the right one. In accordance with Liu et al. (2008), three scenarios could account for the recording of hypooxygenation: (a) the vascular steal mechanism (e.g., Sakatani et al. 1998), (b) the possibility that we detected much the activity in an area adjacent to the activated region, or (c) the hypooxygenation represented a AG-1478 price deactivation of the cortical area (e.g., Hoshi et al. 1994; Sakatani et al. 1998). However, a better understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms during neuronal activity is needed before we can evaluate the relative contributions of each of these scenarios in the hypooxygenation phenomenon. To conclude, our findings indicate that the fNIRS technique is a suitable tool for the examination of performance in overt reading. The advantage of this reading task is that it can be adapted to the participant level.