0023. The value of covalency factor beta and orbital reduction factor k accounts for the covalent nature of the complexes. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“P>Background\n\nFrom a classical point of view, gastric motility acts to clear the stomach between meals, whereas postprandial motility acts to provide a reservoir for food, mixing and grinding the food and to assure a controlled flow of food to the intestines.\n\nAim\n\nTo summarise findings that support the role of gastric motility as a central mediator of hunger, satiation and satiety.\n\nMethods\n\nA literature review using

the search terms ‘satiety’, ‘satiation’ and ‘food intake’ was combined with specific terms corresponding to the sequence of events during and after food intake.\n\nResults\n\nDuring food intake, when gastric emptying of especially solids is limited, gastric distension and gastric accommodation DMH1 chemical structure play an important function in the regulation of satiation. After food intake, when the stomach gradually empties, the role of gastric distension in the determination of appetite decreases and the focus will shift to gastric emptying and intestinal exposure of the nutrients. Finally, we have discussed the role of the empty stomach and the migrating motor complex in the regulation of hunger signals.\n\nConclusions\n\nOur findings indicate that gastric motility is a key mediator

of hunger, satiation and satiety. More specifically, gastric accommodation and gastric emptying play important roles in 3-Methyladenine the regulation of gastric (dis)tension and intestinal exposure of nutrients and Selleckchem Momelotinib hence control satiation and satiety. Correlations between gastric accommodation, gastric emptying and body weight indicate that gastric motility can also play a role in the long-term regulation of body weight.”
“Background: Intramedullary nailing of clavicular midshaft fractures using the

titanium elastic nail has been described as a technically easy, minimally invasive operation with few complications and an early return to competitive sports.\n\nHypothesis: The results reported thus far have been positive. The titanium elastic nail is associated with multiple intraoperative and postoperative problems.\n\nStudy Design: rase series; Level of evidence, 4.\n\nMethods: From April to March 2007, 34 patients at our institution were treated with intramedullary nailing. A standard titanium elastic nail was used in 19 cases and a titanium elastic nail with an end cap in 15 cases. The titanium elastic nail was inserted and advanced under fluoroscopic control. A short incision at the fracture site was made for open reduction if needed. Postoperatively, free range of motion was allowed.\n\nResults: In 62% of patients, open reduction was necessary independent of fracture type, flattening of the titanium elastic nail, or transverse fragments.