[18] QOL is spoken about subjectively by patients during clinical

[18] QOL is spoken about subjectively by patients during clinical discussions as a measure of the potential burden RRT may have on their current lifestyle.[21, 22] In the health research setting, the use of validated tools is helpful to prospectively document change in health status over time and identify potential relationships to other factors such as comorbid disease or biochemical markers.[13, 22, 23] Ceritinib Access to treatment is an important issue where lack of transport may impact the patient’s decision on whether

to commence treatment or not. Many Australian rural patients have to travel great distances or consider moving out of their home or live separately from family and loved ones in order to live close enough to access treatment. This will have a major impact on decision-making regarding whether to commence dialysis treatment or not for the patient, and their entire family and friend network.[22] Commonly reported dimensions of QOL surveys are physical function, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, vitality, general health perceptions, role limitations-emotional, social function and mental health. These self-reported dimensions are influenced by a

multitude of outside factors such as social situation, environmental factors, financial situation, symptoms experienced, personal values and psychological factors,[24, 25] therefore it is important that patients self-administer their own QOL survey to avoid potential Selleck Vorinostat bias and invalidating Ixazomib supplier the results. Staff cannot fill in forms for people with dementia, blindness or illiteracy because of potential bias. Availability of validated translated surveys would reduce the exclusion on non-English-speaking people. It is important there is no transference of clinician’s personal views on the patients QOL. Every person has a unique

and individual perception of what QOL means to them personally, not as judged by someone else, entitling all patients and families to informed decisions regarding treatments. Quality of life instruments widely used within the kidney disease population include the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), which measures eight generic variables in physical and psychological domains, with shorter versions available, the SF-20 and SF-12. Non English speakers should be accommodated for with translated versions of surveys where available. A renal specific survey, the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL), measures 20 variables, which include the eight SF-36 variables plus renal specific variables. It is available in two versions, the KDQOL-SF and KDQOL-36. The KDQOL has translated versions and is available through RAND Health.[26] RAND Health is the research division of the non-profit institution the RAND Corporation based in the USA.

Comments are closed.