[2••]). Although studies

directly linking food-induced brain responses with future weight outcomes are scarce and partly inconsistent 53, 54 and 55, results have been promising: reactivity of multiple brain regions has been found to predict weight-gain [53] or success in weight-loss programs [54]. To find simple measures for brain-based profiling, these lines of research should be integrated such that questionnaire responses are linked to the food-induced brain responses that predict Vorinostat purchase future weight gain. With the current knowledge that many food-specific personality characteristics are interrelated [2••] and appear to modulate the neural response to food cues in similar areas as more general personality characteristics

such as impulsivity and reward sensitivity do, we can speculate that general personality characteristics may be the most learn more promising candidate measures for profiling persons at risk for weight gain. A knowledge gap is that it is still unknown to which specific aspect of eating behavior weight gain can be attributed. Eating patterns are formed by decisions on what to eat, when to start and when to stop eating and together determine meal frequency, meal size, and, ultimately, nutrient intake. These different decisions may have different underlying neurobiological mechanisms and individuals predisposed for weight gain could differ on one or more of these mechanisms [56]. This is highly relevant because weight-management interventions could be tailored to specific problematic eating

behaviors. Most studies focused on the pre-consumption phase by measuring responses to passively viewing food pictures (with a few exceptions). Future studies should focus on the decisions to start or stop eating by linking food-induced brain responses with more intermediate proxies of overweight, such as food choice and meal size 57, 58, 59 and 60. In addition, future studies should establish CYTH4 in how far personality characteristics capture individual differences in sensory specific satiety and sensitivity to gastric filling (and signaling to the brain) [61]. Since the majority of studies assessed personality characteristics with self-report measures (questionnaires), there is a great lack of studies investigating behavioral and neuropsychological tasks, such as a temporal discounting task for measuring impulsivity. Since self-reports are prone to socially desirable responding and demand characteristics [62], we stress that future research should also employ behavioral and neuropsychological tasks. In conclusion, to foster progress in the understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the link between personality characteristics and eating behavior (replication) studies with standardized food cue paradigms and personality characteristics reporting whole-brain results are clearly needed.