34 The positive impacts of community orders have been explained t

34 The positive impacts of community orders have been explained theoretically through concepts of ‘generativity’ whereby offenders are able to realise personal redemption through positive contributions to the community.40 It may be that working on a care farm may also contribute to this sense of generativity. Methods/design Objectives The specific objectives of the ECO study Fostamatinib are: To conduct a systematic review of published and grey literature evaluating the impacts of care farms in improving the health and well-being of disadvantaged

populations. To estimate differences in effectiveness in terms of quality of life, mental health, lifestyle behaviours and reoffending rates between three care farms and between care farms and comparator settings in order to inform sample size calculations for a follow-on natural experiment. To identify factors that drive probation service decisions on where offenders will serve their community order so as to identify potential selection bias and confounders

as well as the most appropriate ways to collect data on these factors. To identify the most appropriate ways to gain informed consent, maximise recruitment, follow-up and effective completion of questionnaires while minimising drop out by offenders. To identify the most appropriate ways to collect cost data on the care farm and comparator interventions and wider costs to health and social care and society and explore the feasibility of measuring of conducting cost-utility analysis and/or a cost-benefit analysis. To draw on qualitative work with offenders, care farmers and probation officers to identify the possible mechanisms that lead to changes in quality of life, health and well-being among offenders attending care farms. Study design: systematic review In light of the challenges of synthesising the existing evidence of the effectiveness of care farms in improving health and well-being, a key component of this study is a mixed methods systematic review of published and unpublished evidence (objective 1). The review title has been registered with the Campbell Collaboration and the full protocol will be available on the Campbell

Collaboration website.41 Details of the review are also available on the PROSPERO website. The study design is summarised Brefeldin_A briefly here. The aim is to systematically review the available evidence of the effects of care farms on quality of life, health and social well-being of service users. Where possible, the evidence will be synthesised to: Understand the size of the effect that care farms may have on the health, well-being or social outcomes of different population groups. Examine whether effects differ depending on the activities and characteristics of the farm/farmer, the duration of time participants spend at the farm, the number and diversity of the participants on the farm, and whether the farm is the only intervention.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>