gingivalis infection. As the reduced immune surveillance begins to benefit the entire biofilm community, local overgrowth of organisms may then overwhelm the structural integrity of the tissues and cause inflammation to rebound. These host responses, however, may be insufficient to control P. gingivalis and, worse, contribute further to tissue damage and bone resorption.

Tissue destruction also releases Small molecule library peptides and heme-containing compounds that stimulate the growth of P. gingivalis. Nutrients derived from inflammation and tissue degradation select for community members that are inflammophilic. Subsequently, however, the activities of P. gingivalis can be constrained, most likely due to a combination of host protective responses and the aggregate efforts of the bacterial community, and a controlled immunoinflammatory state can be restored. This notion is

consistent with the “burst model” of periodontitis, according to which disease chronicity may not represent a constant pathologic process but rather a persistent series of acute insults (bursts) separated by periods of remission [105]. Recent concepts of keystone pathogens in a PSD model of periodontal disease have a profound impact on the development of therapeutic options for periodontal disease. Targeting of P. gingivalis directly, historically the strategy of choice, is no longer the most rational approach as it is difficult to completely https://www.selleckchem.com/products/carfilzomib-pr-171.html eliminate the organism and P. gingivalis is effective keystone pathogen at low levels of abundance. The ability of P. gingivalis to survive inside epithelial cells also hinders elimination as intra-cellular P. gingivalis are protected from antibiotics and can serve as a source for recrudescence of PtdIns(3,4)P2 infection [106, 107]. Rather, community manipulation has emerged as an option, albeit still theoretical. Elevating numbers of organisms that normally constrain P. gingivalis and reducing those that are synergistic with P. gingivalis would foster commensalism and prevent the transition to a pathogenic community. Targeting of host cell processes is another avenue worthy of exploration. This could involve anti-inflammatory

approaches to inhibit destructive inflammation that indirectly would also exert antimicrobial effects (limitation of inflammatory exudate-derived nutrients) or the targeted blockade of immune evasion pathways. In this regard, antagonizing complement pathways in the gingival tissues could lock the host in a mode that is nonresponsive to the subversive activities of P. gingivalis, and potentially to other keystone pathogens. Moreover, enhancing protective innate immunity in ways that counteract chemokine paralysis, TLR4 antagonism, and other bacterial strategies with community-wide impact may also help restore periodontal tissue homeostasis. The authors’ research is supported by NIH/NIDCR grants: DE015254, DE017138, DE021580, and DE021685 (to G.H.