The only possibility for use of these compounds in sequential fashion might be Rapamycin order if a change in therapy is contemplated at a time that resistance has not yet Ulixertinib concentration developed against either of these agents. The rationale for such a substitution could include the fact that RAL is a twice-daily drug and that some patients might prefer to be on the once-daily regimen of co-formulated EVG/c/TDF/FTC. In contrast, there are some patients who cannot take a pharmacological booster such as cobicistat for reasons of drug interactions and who might need instead to take the twice-daily regimen of RAL, complemented by two members of the nucleoside family of drugs [70]. The use of DTG

to rescue patients who have first developed resistance to RAL has also been studied and documented [71]. In almost all cases, it appears as though some measure of patient benefit can be obtained if DTG is used to treat individuals who have developed resistance to either RAL or EVG, after

the development buy Palbociclib of mutations in the integrase gene that follow one of the well-described resistance pathways for these compounds. However, it should also be noted that DTG may not be as effective in this setting as it is in first-line therapy. Indeed, the VIKING (A Pilot Study Assessing the Integrase Inhibitor GSK1349572 in HIV-infected Persons With Virus Resistant to Raltegravir) clinical trials in which DTG was used to rescue patients who first developed resistance against RAL showed that patients

will have to receive DTG bid dosing at a total intake that is double the dose of DTG that is commonly used in first-line therapy [71]. The results also suggest that patients who first develop mutations that follow the RAL/EVG 148/140 mutational pathway are less likely to respond to DTG than are INSTI-naïve individuals. This raises the important question of whether DTG Anidulafungin (LY303366) can be saved for use as part of a second-line regimen, instead of being used in first-line therapy. Clearly, patients who have failed RAL or EVG and who have few other treatment options might benefit from the use of DTG and should be treated with this drug. However, this does not mean that DTG should be saved for use in later treatment regimens. In support of this, the FLAMINGO (Dolutegravir Compared to Darunavir/Ritonavir, Each in Combination With Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) in ART-naive Subjects) study recently demonstrated the superiority of DTG over DRV/r in first-line therapy, when patients also received two nucleos(t)ides [47]. Should DTG be used as a First-Line Drug? The danger of delaying the use of DTG is that significant numbers of individuals who develop resistance to RAL and/or EVG may, by that time, have lost their ability to respond in fully efficacious fashion to DTG.