The study included 32 dental students, 16 men and 16 women (aged

The study included 32 dental students, 16 men and 16 women (aged 18 to 40 years).

The Selleckchem PKC412 participants had no signs of muscular or articular pain. SCI was recorded for participants using a CADIAX® compact 2 electronic axiograph. The mean SCI in both men and women varied between 26.1° and 61.8°, with a mean of 41.9° (SD 7.8). The mean right SCI was 42.0° (SD 8.5), and the mean left SCI was 41.9° (SD 9.2). The mean SCI for men was 40.3° (SD 7.9), and the mean for women was 43.6° (SD 7.7). No statistically significant difference in SCI values was found between the right and left side (p = 0.995), or between the male and female groups (p = 0.133). Also, no correlation could be found between SCI and the age of the participants (r2 = 0.016, p = 0.489). The mean value of SCI was within the range reported in previous studies. SCI find more is highly variable, but this variability does not seem to be attributed to condylar asymmetry, gender, or age of the adult participants. This high variability suggests that independent condylar

measurements should be conducted for each patient instead of relying on reported average values. “
“Despite requiring dental crown preparation and possible root canal treatment, besides the difficulty of clinical and laboratory repairs, and financial burden, the association between fixed (FPD) and removable partial dentures (RPD) by means of attachments is an important alternative for oral rehabilitation, particularly when the use of dental implants and FPDs is limited or not indicated. Among the advantages of attachment-retained RPDs are the improvements in esthetics and biomechanics, as well as correction of the buccal arrangement of anterior teeth in Kennedy Class III partially edentulous arches. This article describes the treatment sequence and technique for the use of

attachments in therapy combining FPD/RPD. The use of fixed partial dentures 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 (FPDs) in oral rehabilitation may not be recommended when the remaining teeth are unable to withstand masticatory loadings. Thus, from the biomechanical point of view, the use of dental implants may be the choice, provided that prerequisites are fulfilled.[1-3] When the use of dental implants and/or conventional FPDs is limited or not indicated, association between an FPD and removable partial denture (RPD) by means of attachments becomes an important alternative to a conventional clasp-retained RPD.[4-6] In addition to clasps used to prevent the dislodgment of RPDs from the rest position during functional movements,[7] devices such as adhesive attachments, crowns, and FPDs with intra- or extracoronal attachments, telescopes, root-caps, and/or prefabricated intraradicular retainers may also be used to retain these prostheses.[8-11] Attachments are classified as semiprecision and precision devices.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>