This measurement and growth temperature effect on the J max/V Cma

This measurement and GSK2245840 cell line growth temperature effect on the J max/V Cmax ratio in low irradiance grown Arabidopsis is difficult to interpret. It cannot be excluded that variation in limitation by the mesophyll conductance for CO2 diffusion interfered with the J max and V Cmax calculations (Ethier and Livingston 2004). Alternatively, the opposite temperature effect

on J max /V Cmax at the two growth irradiances could be the result of variation in temperature dependencies of J max and/or V Cmax with growth irradiance. Limitation by triose phosphate utilization The O2 sensitivity of photosynthesis was used to quantify CHIR98014 ic50 the temperature dependence of the limitation of photosynthesis by TPU at the growth irradiance. Two measures of the photosynthetic rate were used, A growth and ETR. The HT-plants showed no increase of A growth upon exposure to 1 % O2 at 10 °C and a strong decrease in ETR (Fig. 5). A similar response was evident from the CO2 response curves of HTHL-plants that showed no increase of photosynthesis above ambient [CO2] (Fig. 2). This clear indication of limitation by TPU diminished when the measurement temperature was increased to 16 °C and was virtually absent at the growth temperature of 22 °C and above. The LT-plants, however,

did not show any decrease in ETR across the range of measurement temperatures from 10 to 28 °C in response to a decrease of the O2 concentration from 21 to 1 %, nor a less than expected increase of A growth (Fig. 5). These plants thus showed no signs of limitation by TPU. Alleviation of TPU limitation with acclimation to cold is well known in Arabidopsis (Strand et al. 1997), which is likely to occur by an increase in the

AZD2171 price capacity of sucrose synthesis (Stitt and Hurry 2002). Growth irradiance effects were generally larger than the effects of growth temperature at the level of the two factor used in the experiments. However, the O2 sensitivity of photosynthesis at 10 °C was an exception as the temperature effect was much larger than the irradiance effect for these variables (Tables 1, 2; Fig. 5). Fig. 5 DOCK10 Temperature dependence of the change in photosynthetic rate as a result of a decrease in [O2] from 21 % (atmospheric) to 1 % (mean ± SE; n = 4). The electron transport rate (ETR; upper panels) and the CO2 assimilation rate at the growth irradiance (A growth; lower panels) are shown. When limitation by triose-phosphate utilization (TPU) does not play a role, the A growth and ETR are expected to increase and to remain constant, respectively. Symbols and treatments as in Fig. 1 The reduction of ETR and the absence of the increase of A growth at low [O2] measured at 10 and 16 °C was much less in HTLL-plants compared to HTHL-plants (Fig. 5), which resulted in a highly significant interaction of growth temperature and irradiance at 10 °C (Table 1). Remarkably, the CO2 response curves of HTLL-plants measured at 10 °C showed no indication of limitation by TPU (Fig. 2).

Comments are closed.