P-value

of < 0.05 BI 10773 price was considered as statistically significant. Results Patients characteristics From January 2008 to August 2008,229 patients were randomly enrolled onto the study. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Groups were comparable regarding age, sex and drug which distribution were balanced (p > 0.05) (Table 1). All patients received chemotherapy. There were 108 patients in test group and 106 patients in control group who took part in filling QoL assessment. Table 1 characteristics of patients in two groups   Test group Control group Number of patients 121 108 Age range (mean standard deviation)    male 40-73(54 ± 9.23) 41-74(54.5 ± 10.33)    female 27-68(48.25 ± 12.70) 18-67(49.58 ± 12.12) Gender        Male 72 (59.50%) 65 (60.20%)    Female 49 (40.50%) 43 (39.80%) Drug    Cisplain(75 mg/m2) 56 (46.30%) 44 (40.70%)    Oxaliplatin(85 mg/m2) 27 (22.30%) 26 AG-881 (24.10%)    Epirubicin(90 mg/m2) 19 (15.7%) 22 (20.4%)    Carboplatin(AUC 5) 9 (7.40%) 4 (3.7%)    Adriamycin(50 mg/m2) 10 (8.3%) 10 (9.3%)    Dacarbazine(200 mg/m2) 0 2(1.9%) Cancer type    Lung 39 15    Stomach 9 12    Breast 23 31    Ovarian 10 2    Lymphoma 12 10    Oesophageal 5 6    Colorectal 16 14    Oropharyngeal 3 0    Teratoma

4 0    Gingival 0 3    Thymus 0 4    Cervical 0 4    Laryngeal 0 2    Malignant melanoma 0 3    Glioblastoma 0 2 Primary efficacy analysis Both of test group and control group had showed better efficacy on controlling CINV. Comparison of drug efficacy was shown in Table 2. Compared with control group, complete response for acute period in test group with highly or moderately buy LY3039478 emetogenic chemotherapy had no difference (p > 0.05), complete response for delayed nausea and vomiting in patients with highly emetogenic chemotherapy respectively improved 39.21%(69.64% versus 30.43%, p < 0.05), 22.05% (78.57% versus 56.52%, p < 0.05), complete response for delayed nausea and vomiting in patients with moderately Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II emetogenic chemotherapy respectively improved

25.01%(83.07% versus 58.06%, p < 0.05), 13.43% (89.23% versus75.80%, p < 0.05), complete response for the whole period of nausea and vomiting in patients with highly emetogenic chemotherapy respectively improved 41.38% (69.64% versus 28.26%, p < 0.05), 22.05% (78.57% versus 56.52%, p < 0.05), complete response for the whole period of nausea and vomiting in patients with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy respectively improved 26.62% (83.07% versus 56.45%, p < 0.05), 13.43% (89.23% versus 75.80%, p < 0.05). Age was significantly correlated with acute, delayed and the whole period nausea in the level of 0.01. Table 2 Complete response of CINV   Complete response (%)   AN AV DN DV NC VC   H M H M H M H M H M H M TG 94.64 98.46 91.07 96.92 69.64 83.07 78.57 89.23 69.64 83.07 78.57 89.23 CG 86.96 93.54 89.13 96.77 30.43 58.06 56.52 75.80 28.26 56.45 56.52 75.80 P value > 0.05 > 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.